Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

976 F.2d 726

Docket No. 92-6452.

Johnson v. Herbert

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: August 31, 1992 Decided: Sept. 17, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-09-17

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 1994 · most notably United States v. Osiemi (1993), Kosnoski v. Howley (1994)

35 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-09-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-91-563)

Norman Trent Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

John Adrian Gibney, Jr., Sarah Jane Chittom, Shuford, Rubin & Gibney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Norman Trent Johnson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Herbert, No. CA-91-563 (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/976/f2d/726 · .json · Public domain