Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census v. Federal Labor Relations Authority’s Empirical Analysis
976 F.2d 882 · 1992
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 7116 · 5 U.S.C. § 7123 · 5 U.S.C. § 7512
Relies on United States v. Fausto · Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations Authority · Cornelius v. Nutt · 55 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1675, 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,952 Julio M. Cruz v. Department of the Navy · Barnes v. Small
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We do not find dispositive the fact that [the employee] cited one statutory provision for his [unfair-labor-practice] complaint, and another for his MSPB procedure. All that this reveals is the obvious: that the statutory provisions governing the adjudication of [unfair, labor practices] before the FLRA and grievances under the MSPB procedure are different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.