Kemet Electronics Corp. v. Barshefsky’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 2155 · 19 U.S.C. § 2902 · 19 U.S.C. § 2903 · 19 U.S.C. § 3521 · 19 U.S.C. § 3524 · 28 U.S.C. § 1581 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 2631
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Allen v. Wright · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization · Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny civil action of which the Court of International Trade has jurisdiction... may be commenced in the court by any person adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of section 702 of title 5.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.