Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 976 P.2d 581 - In Re Young

In Re Young’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2023

19 state decisions

901999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Society of Separationists, Inc. v. Whitehead · West v. Thomson Newspapers · Stewart v. Utah Public Service Commission · Brinkerhoff v. Forsyth · Louisiana Associated General Contractors, Inc. v. State ex rel. Division of Administration, Office of State Purchasing

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, are the [actors] in question “charged with the exercise of powers properly belonging to” one of the three branches of government? Second, is the function that the statute has given the [actors] one “appertaining to” another branch of government? The third and final step in the analysis asks: if the answer to both of the above questions is “yes,” does the constitution “expressly” direct or permit exercise of the otherwise forbidden function? If not, article V, section 1 is transgressed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “charged with the exercise of powers properly belonging to”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The powers of the government of the State of Utah shall be divided into three distinct departments, the Legislative, the Executive, and the Judicial; and no person charged with the exercise of powers properly belonging to one of these departments, shall exercise any functions appertaining to either of the others, except in the eases herein expressly directed or permitted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.