Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 976 P.2d 669 - Britton v. State

Britton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hampton v. State · Bradley v. State · Leeper v. State · Ketcham v. State · Beintema v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(e) Amendment of information or citation. -Without leave of the court, the attorney for the state may amend an information or citation until five days before a preliminary examination in a case required to be tried in district court or until five days before trial for a case not required to be tried in district court. The court may permit an information or citation to be amended: (1) with the defendant's consent, at any time before sentencing. (2) Whether or not the defendant consents: (A) At any time before trial if substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced. (B) At any time before verdict or finding if no additional or different offense is charged and if substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When an issue is not raised at trial, the burden is upon the appellant to establish that plain error occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.