Marshall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 51 Cal. 3d 395 - People v. Hedgecock · 760 So. 2d 903 - Way v. State · 579 So. 2d 97 - Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Maler · 95 So. 2d 594 - Russ v. State · State v. Hamilton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party who believes that grounds for legal challenge to a verdict exist may move for an order permitting an interview of a juror or jurors to determine whether the verdict is subject to the challenge . . . If the interview is permitted, the court may prescribe the place, manner, conditions, and scope of the interview.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.