976 So. 2d 204 - State v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 960 So. 2d 333 - State v. Brazile · 789 So. 2d 696 - State v. Baudier · State v. Blazio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. The period of limitation established by Article 578 shall be interrupted if: (1) The defendant at any time, with the purpose to avoid detection, apprehension, or prosecution, flees, from the state, is outside the state, or is absent from his usual place of abode within the state; or (2) The defendant cannot be tried because of insanity or because his presence for trial cannot be obtained by legal process, or for any other cause beyond the control of the state; or (8) The defendant fails to appear at any proceeding pursuant to actual notice, proof of which appears of record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.