Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 976 SO2D 372 - Koestler v. Koestler

Koestler v. Koestler’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gray v. State · W. T. Raleigh Co. v. Armstrong · Travelhost, Inc. v. Blandford · 797 So. 2d 888 - PUBLIC EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. Dishmon · 420 So. 2d 1356 - Strong v. Bostick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by or made known to him at or before the hearing. If of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field in forming opinions or inferences upon the subject, the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.