Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

976 So. 2d 577

Docket No. SC06-755.

Barron v. State

Terry BARRON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 21, 2008.

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 2008-02-21

Relies on 955 So. 2d 517 - Galindez v. State · 911 So. 2d 813 - Isaac v. State · Barron v. State

Decided 2008-02-21

¶1Terry Barron, Pro se, Crestview, FL, for Petitioner.

¶2*578 Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We have for review Barron v. State,931 So.2d 929 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified conflict with Isaac v. State,911 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction filed, No. SC05-2047 (Fla. Oct.31, 2005). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

¶5We stayed proceedings in this case pending disposition of Galindez v. State,955 So.2d 517 (Fla.2007), which we ultimately decided on harmless error grounds based on a thorough review of the record. We thereafter issued an order directing petitioner to show cause why our Galindez decision should not control the outcome of the present case. However, petitioner's response does not contain enough information or record attachments for us to perform a Galindez harmless error analysis. Moreover, we cannot unilaterally perform such an analysis, as the record is not before this Court.

¶6We accordingly grant the petition for review in the present case. The decision under review is quashed and this matter is remanded to the Second District Court for application of a harmless error analysis based on our decision in Galindez and a thorough review of the record.

¶7It is so ordered.

¶8LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

/976/so2d/577 · .json · Public domain