Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 976 SO2D 660 - Dinkens v. State

Dinkens v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Shepard v. United States · Jones v. State · 451 So. 2d 817 - Gurganus v. State · 884 So. 2d 476 - McBride v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is based solely on prior convictions and therefore does not require a jury determination pursuant to Apprendi”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “has been repeatedly rejected by Florida courts”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.