Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 976 SO2D 90 - P.N. v. State

P.N. v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 705 So. 2d 1376 - JB v. State · E.A.B. v. State · A.P.R. v. State · 461 So. 2d 165 - AA v. State · S.C.S. v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the State, if the State fails to present sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case of the crime charged, then a judgment of dismissal is proper.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The standard of review that applies to a motion for judgment of dismissal in a juvenile case is the same standard that applies to a motion for judgment of acquittal in a criminal case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.