976 So. 2d 957 - Kumar v. Kumar’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 826 So. 2d 719 - Russell v. Performance Toyota, Inc. · 614 So. 2d 394 - Smith v. Smith · 708 So. 2d 55 - Mizell v. Mizell · 626 So. 2d 140 - Daigle v. Daigle · 882 So. 2d 229 - Brooks v. Roberts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) endangers life, limb, or health, or creates a reasonable apprehension of such danger, rendering the relationship unsafe for the party seeking relief or (2) is so unnatural and infamous as to make the marriage revolting to the non-offending spouse and render it impossible for that spouse to discharge the duties of marriage, thus destroying the basis for its continuance.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.