Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 976 SW2D 450 - State v. Reber

State v. Reber’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2018

8 state decisions

40199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Day v. State · Thomas v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “governed by the rules of civil procedure insofar as applicable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]t would only cause delay in the processing of the [post-conviction] claim [to] apply[ ] the denomination requirement of Rule 74.01(a) to post-conviction appeals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]n order sustaining or overruling a motion filed under the provisions of [either rule] shall be deemed a final judgment for purposes of appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.