Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

976 S.W.2d 502

Carlson v. Peet

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1998

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1998-06-23

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2004

9 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-06-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Frederick J. Peet appeals from entry of a default judgment against him in the amount of $26,277.49 plus costs, for failure to attend his own deposition. Frank J. Carlson’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Untimely Filed is denied.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value.

¶4The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

/976/sw2d/502 · .json · Public domain