Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

976 S.W.2d 594

Sapienza v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 1998

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1998-09-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2008

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-09-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Anthony Sapienza (Movant) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment overruling his Rule 24.036 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. In his only point on appeal, Movant disputes the court’s failure to grant him an evidentiary hearing on his claim that his guilty plea was involuntary and coerced.

¶3We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/976/sw2d/594 · .json · Public domain