COM. EX REL. CORBETT v. Snyder’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)
Relies on Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz · United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · Wicks v. Milzoco Builders, Inc. · Summit Towne Centre, Inc. v. Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc. · Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Israel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘An abuse of discretion is not merely an error in judgment.’ Ambrogi v. Reber, 932 A.2d 969, 974 (Pa.Super.2007), appeal denied, 597 Pa. 725 , 952 A.2d 673 (2008). ‘Rather an abuse of discretion exists if the trial court renders a judgment that is [plainly] unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious, fails to apply the law, or was motivated by partiality, prejudice, bias or ill will.’ Id. ‘If the record supports the trial court’s reasons and factual basis, the court did not abuse its discretion.’ Id. In addition, the facts are to be viewed in a light most favorable to the winner at the trial court level .... (emphasis added).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In the Matter of Private Sale of Property by the Millcreek Township School District Appeal of: Montessori Regional Charter School · J.D. Grine v. County of Centre, The McShane Firm, LLC and T.C. Tanski Appeal of: County of Centre K. Gillette-Walker v. County of Centre, Shubin Law Office, P.C., and S.P. McGraw Appeal of: County of Centre“(1) necessity to prevent immediate and irreparable harm that cannot be adequately compensated by damages; (2) greater injury would result from refusing an injunction than from granting it; (3) an injunction will properly restore the parties to their status as it existed prior to the alleged wrongful conduct; (4) the right to relief is clear, and that the wrong is manifest, and success on the merits is likely; (5) the injunction is reasonably suited to abate the offending activity; and, (6) an injunction will not adversely affect the public interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is limited to determining whether the trial court abused its discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.