Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

977 A.2d 345

In Re Schwartz

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 2009-07-16

Relies on Matter of Addams · Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Schwartz · Attorney Grievance Commission v. Schwartz

Decided 2009-07-16

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 On consideration of the certified copy of the order issued by the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent by consent, see Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Schwartz, 408 Md. 34, 968 A.2d 139 (2009), this court’s May 18, 2009, order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending final disposition by this court, and Bar Counsel’s June 29, 2009, Statement Regarding Reciprocal Discipline recommending disbarment as identical reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has filed no response or opposition to the recommendation, it is

¶3 ORDERED that Bradley David Schwartz is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. *346 See In re Addams, 579 A.2d 190, 191 (D.C. 1990) (en banc). It is

¶4 FURTHER ORDERED that, for purposes of reinstatement, this disbarment will not commence until such time as respondent files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

/977/a2d/345 · .json · Public domain