Cooke v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
July 2021
most recently cited
1 district · 26 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst · Wainwright v. Sykes · McMann v. Richardson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where counsel entirely fails to subject the prosecution's case to meaningful adversarial testing”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Stanley v. State · Taylor v. State“both consult with the defendant and obtain consent to the recommended course of action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Taylor v. State“where there is a complete denial of counsel,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stanley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.