United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
977 F.2d 1297 · 1992
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Austin Products Co. v. Workers' Compensation Insurers Rating Association of Minnesota · Bokum Resources Corp. v. Long Island Lighting Co. · United States v. Willis · United States v. Boone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no fingerprints were obtained off of the bag” with the cocaine; and (5) he was not informed of the punishment range that could be imposed. Id. at 1298-99 . The district court denied these allegations after comparing them with Johnson's testimony in the Rule 11 hearing and the written plea agreement, finding Johnson's allegations to be”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) whether defendant established a fair and just reason to withdraw his plea; (2) whether defendant asserts his legal innocence of a charge; (3) the length of time between the guilty plea and the motion to withdraw; and (4) if the defendant established a fair and just reason for withdrawal, whether the government will be prejudiced.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.