Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 977 F.2d 1332 - Ingram v. Acands, Inc.

Ingram v. Acands, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

977 F.2d 1332 · 1992

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
6
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Bonin v. Calderon (1995), United States Lower Elwha Band of S'Klallams v. Lummi Indian Tribe (2000)

21 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

2901992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Lord Electric Co. v. United States · Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis · Alder v. United States · Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc. · Union Bank v. Wolas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`it is the jury's task to determine if the presence of that asbestos played a role in the occurrence of the plaintiff's injuries'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a separate order " because not signed by the deputy clerk who prepared it, did not contain "order”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] party should not have to run the risk that the order he may choose to appeal from may not be the same order a court of appeals decides he should have chosen.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.