Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

977 F.2d 573

Docket No. 92-6372.

Robert William Newell v. David A. Garraghty, Warden

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: August 11, 1992 Decided: October 6, 1992

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-10-06

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Leon David Organ, Jr. v. Eugene M. Grizzard Attorney General of Virginia

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-10-06

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-91-703)

Robert William Newell, Appellant Pro Se.

Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

Dismissed.

Before PHILLIPS, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Robert William Newell seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Newell v. Garraghty, No. CA-91-703 (E.D. Va. Mar. 10, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/977/f2d/573 · .json · Public domain