Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

977 F.2d 574

Docket No. 92-6089.

Clayton Dorsey Stewart v. Charles E. Thompson Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia Edward Murray

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: September 14, 1992 Decided: October 21, 1992

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-10-21

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States of America v. Treadwell

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-10-21

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

Clayton Dorsey Stewart, Appellant Pro Se.

Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Clayton Dorsey Stewart seeks to appeal the district court's orders refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Stewart v. Thompson, No. CA-90-661-R (E.D. Va. Apr. 22 and Dec. 31, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/977/f2d/574 · .json · Public domain