Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 977 FSUPP 1457 - Mayers v. Reno

Mayers v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
May 1999
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2342 · 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Reno v. Flores · Felker v. Turpin · Carlson v. Landon · Heikkila v. Barber · Yang v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Terrazas-Garcia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION. Except as provided in this section and notwithstanding any other provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to hear any cause or claim by or on behalf of any alien arising from the decision or action by the Attorney General to commence proceedings, adjudicate cases, or execute removal orders against any alien under this chapter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “without limitation to claims arising from all past, pending, or future exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings under [this] Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a conclusion that the Petitioner must seek whatever relief is available in the court of appeals is somewhat of a red herring.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.