Daniel v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 28 U.S.C. § 2674 · 28 U.S.C. § 2675
Relies on McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · United States v. Kubrick · Ohio National Life Insurance v. United States · Musson Theatrical, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp. · Rogers v. Stratton Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'R.C. 2305.113(C) "means what it says. If a lawsuit bringing a medical * * * claim is not commenced within four years after the occurrence of the act or omission constituting the basis for the claim, then any action upon that claim is barred.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he action being a statutory one relating to a specific type of cause, i.e., wrongful death, the phrase, 'except as otherwise provided by law,' can only relate to other provisions relating to death. And the only other provisions relating to death actions are those contained in the wrongful death statute itself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“That is the sole category of exceptions to the two-year wrongful death statute of limitations the Ohio legislature has seen fit to include. Following the reasoning in Klema and Koler, the Court finds that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.