Greider v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Mendenhall · California v. Carney · 626 So. 2d 185 - Popple v. State · 945 So. 2d 1174 - Golphin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Popple v. State, 626 So.2d 185, 186 (Fla.1993), our supreme court defined three levels of police-citizen encounters. The first level is considered a consensual encounter and involves only minimal police contact. During a consensual encounter a citizen may either voluntarily comply with a police officer’s requests or choose to ignore them. Because the citizen is free to leave during a consensual encounter, constitutional safeguards are not invoked. Id. Next on the escalating hierarchy of police-citizen encounters is “an investigatory stop.” See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). For a police officer to lawfully detain a citizen, “an investigatory stop requires a well-founded, articulable suspicion of criminal activity. Mere suspicion is not enough to support a stop.” Popple, 626 So.2d at 186 . The third and final level of a police-citizen encounter “involves an arrest which must be supported by probable cause that a crime has been or is being committed.” Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dermio v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.