Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 977 SW2D 189 - Gonzales v. State

Gonzales v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States · United States v. Flores Perez · United States v. Cox · Isam v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is hornbook law that indictments cannot be considered as evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re VV
  2. “[a]n indictment or information is not evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re VV

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.