Oldham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The type of order required by Trevino reinstates jurisdiction in the trial court and returns appellant to the point after judgment and assessment of sentence, but before imposition of sentence and filing of notice of appeal. Therefore, since the appeal must be set aside to allow appellant to file her motion for new trial, this case cannot remain in this Court. For this reason, we must issue a mandate disposing of this appeal. If appellant’s motion for new trial is granted, then her case will be retried. If the motion is denied, the trial court should pronounce sentence and appellant may give notice of appeal within ninety days after sentencing. After appellant files her timely notice of appeal, the case will be refiled in the appellate court. Accordingly, the sentence and notice of appeal are set aside and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a hearing on the motion for new trial and for the orderly conduct of subsequent post-trial proceedings, in accordance with this opinion.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Oldham v. State

2. “1. Whose burden is it to show that an appellant was or was not abandoned by counsel during a critical stage of the prosecution? 2. May an appellate court suspend application of the rules of appellate procedure without any firm basis in the record for finding good cause?”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Oldham v. State