Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 977 SW2D 610 - Ex Parte Smith

Ex Parte Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2012 · most notably Barrientes v. Johnson (2000), Ex Parte Reed (2008)

3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

210199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2261 (§ 107 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Murray v. Carrier · Harris v. Reed · Grunsfeld v. State · Ex Parte Torres · State Ex Rel. Holmes v. Honorable Court of Appeals for the Third District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]lthough Presiding Judge McCormick's opinion [in Davis] is labeled a concurring opinion, it was joined by a majority of the Court and may be regarded as an opinion for the Court.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Subject to such regulations as may be prescribed by law, the Court of Criminal Appeals and the Judges thereof shall have the power to issue the writ of habeas corpus....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “the Legislature clearly has intended for Article 11.071 to provide the exclusive means by which this Court may exercise its original habeas corpus jurisdiction in death penalty cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.