Ex Parte Colella’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1998
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2261 (§ 107 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Murray v. Carrier · Harris v. Reed · Ex Parte Smith · Ex Parte Ramos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]ur oaths are to uphold the constitutions and laws.... The law is clear: this court shall dismiss this application because it was filed late.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Ex Parte Smith“Was the application in Ramos filed late? The answer leaps out as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Ex Parte Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.