Davidson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2001
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Guzman v. State · Nevada v. Hall · Sun Oil Company v. Wortman · Heitman v. State · Hughes v. Fetter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Sec. 3(a) No oral or sign language statement of an accused made as a result of custodial interrogation shall be admissible against the accused in a criminal proceeding unless: (1) an electronic recording, which may include motion picture, video tape, or other visual recording, is made of the statement. Section 3(e) further provides: The courts of this State shall strictly construe Subsection 3(a) of this section and may not interpret Subsection (a) as making admissible a statement unless all requirements of the subsection have been satisfied by the State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davidson v. State“[n]o question of whether the admission of the confession violates any of the provisions of article 38.22 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure is presented in this appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davidson v. State“Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davidson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.