Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

977 S.W.2d 934

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1998

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1998-10-06

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2010

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-10-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Steve Williams (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/977/sw2d/934 · .json · Public domain