Reahard v. Lee County’s Empirical Analysis
978 F.3d 1212 · 1992
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2018
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City · Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City of Alabaster · Fitzgerald v. Seaboard System Railroad · Reahard v. Lee County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We always must investigate questions of subject matter jurisdiction, whether or not they are raised by the parties to the case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.