Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

978 F.2d 1254

Docket No. 92-2023.

Brown v. Kee

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: October 26, 1992 Decided: November 6, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-11-06

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 1993 · most notably Harvey Mark Dupree v. Commonwealth of Virginia Greensville Correctional Center (1992), Artis v. Greensville Correctional Center (1993)

33 federal appellate ·

Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · United States v. Robinson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-11-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-1543-N)

Jerome Julius Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

Dismissed.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Jerome Julius Brown noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/978/f2d/1254 · .json · Public domain