Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

978 F.2d 1255

Docket No. 91-7324.

Edward Girard Lail v. David A. Williams Mary Sue Terry

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: September 4, 1992 Decided: October 27, 1992

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-10-27

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. So-Lo Foods, Inc., T/a Bi-Lo So-Lo Foods, Inc., T/a Valu Food

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-10-27

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-91-257-3)

Edward Girard Lail, Appellant Pro Se.

John H. McLees, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

Dismissed.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Edward Lail seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lail v. Williams, No. CA-91-257-3 (E.D. Va. Sep. 25, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/978/f2d/1255 · .json · Public domain