Stewart v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis
978 F.3d 199 · 1992
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
September 2000
most recently cited
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Penry v. Lynaugh · Enmund v. Florida · Jurek v. Texas · Boyde v. California · Cabana v. Bullock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The petitioner] does not satisfy his burden of demonstrating a “reasonable likelihood that the jury ... appli[ed] the challenged instructions in a way that prevented] the consideration of constitutionally relevant evidence.” Boyde v. California, 494 U.S. 370 , 371, 110 S.Ct. 1190 , 1191, 108 L.Ed.2d 316 (1990). The punishment phase issues allowed the jury to give mitigating effect to [the petitioner’s] alleged non-triggerman status if they chose to credit his version of the offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Montoya v. Scott · Green v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.