Su’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2019
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. · Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp. · Vaughan v. Atkinson · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co. · Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'look[s] to the common law in considering maritime torts.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“At the end of a voyage, the master shall pay each seafarer the balance of wages due the seafarer within 24 hours after the cargo has been discharged or within 4 days after the seafarer is discharged, whichever is earlier.... When the payment is not [timely] made ... without sufficient cause, the master or owner shall pay to the seafarer 2 days’ wages for each day payment is delayed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he seafarers bear the burden of showing that the shipowners paid less than the full amount of wages due.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mateo v. M/S Kiso
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.