United States v. Pollen’s Empirical Analysis
978 F.3d 78 · 1992
Citation profile
62 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 101 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably United States v. Voigt (1996), United States v. Bertoli (1994)
62 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1510 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Bibby v. United States · United States v. Broce · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Chapman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a defendant who pleads guilty to a criminal charge may subsequently assert a claim of multiple punishment in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause only if the violation is apparent on the face of the indictment or record.”) (quotation omitted). 12 . The Court notes that the statute of limitations for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 371 is five years under 18 U.S.C. § 3282 and”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The district court's improper calculation..., resulting in a significantly higher Guideline sentencing range, certainly is an error that seriously affected [defendant's] substantial rights and so amounts to plain error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[WJ hen ambiguity in a criminal statute cannot be clarified by either its legislative history or inferences drawn from the overall statutory scheme, the ambiguity is resolved in favor of the defendants.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.