Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 978 SO2D 272 - Allwine v. State

Allwine v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hall v. State · 966 So. 2d 493 - Aversano v. State · 596 So. 2d 1055 - State v. Camp · 870 So. 2d 923 - Bertone v. State · State v. Nesta

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a single indictment or information may, under proper circumstances, charge theft and dealing in stolen property in connection with one scheme or course of conduct in separate counts that may be consolidated for trial, but the trier of fact may return a guilty verdict on one or the other, but not both, of the counts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.