Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 978 S.W.2d 289 - Session v. State

Session v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
November 2001
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 291st Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Flowers v. State · Watson v. State · Vasquez v. State · Wooten v. State · Mooney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]ut if the appeal is from a judgment rendered on a defendant’s plea of guilty or nolo contendere under- Code of Criminal Procedure article 1.15, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant, the notice must: (A) specify that the appeal is for a jurisdictional defect; (B) specify that the substance of the appeal was raised by written motion and ruled on before trial; or (C)state that the trial court granted permission to appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “triggered by and based upon a voluntary plea of guilty or nolo con-tendere with a plea bargain in place .... it is begging the question to say that this rule is applicable to this case because it involves a plea of guilty or nolo contendere and yet, the question whether there was a voluntary plea to that effect is not allowed to be reviewed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.