Schilling v. Human Support Services’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Chromalloy American Corp. v. Elyria Foundry Co. · State Ex Rel. William Ranni Associates, Inc. v. Hartenbach · Empiregas, Inc., of Noel v. Hoover Ball & Bearing Co. · Dillaplain v. Lite Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any person or firm, whether or not a citizen or resident of this state, or any corporation, who in. person or through an agent does any of the acts enumerat ed in this section, thereby submits such person, firm, or corporation, and if an individual, his personal representative, to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state as to any cause of action arising from the doing of any of such acts: [[Image here]] (3) The commission of a tortious act within this state; [[Image here]]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) the nature and the quality of the contact; (2) the quantity of those contacts; (3) the relationship of the cause of action to those contacts; (4) the interest in Missouri in providing a forum for its residents; and (5) the convenience or inconvenience to the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.