Jackson v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
December 2000
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anglim v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · Williams Ex Rel. Wilford v. Barnes Hospital · Brines by and Through Harlan v. Cibis · Oldaker v. Peters · Jackson v. City of Blue Springs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Intentional nondisclosure occurs: 1) where there exists no reasonable inability to comprehend the information solicited by the question asked of the prospective juror, and 2) where it develops that the prospective juror actually remembers the experience or that it was of such significance that his purported forgetfulness is unreasonable. Unintentional nondisclosure exists where, for example, the experience forgotten was insignificant or remote in time, or where the venireman reasonably misunderstands the question posed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wemott v. Tonkens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.