Wright v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
3 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · Ready v. United States · Hammond v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The [trial] court denied the second motion without a hearing, ruling that appellant did not provide any factual support for his claims, and that he had failed to explain how the information which allegedly should have been disclosed was ex culpatory or would undermine confidence in the jury’s verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wright v. Stansberry“[b]oth men were convicted of various offenses, including firstdegree murder while armed and conspiracy to commit that offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the government did not suppress the materials or information on which appellant bases his claims”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.