Munger v. Erickson’s Empirical Analysis
979 F.2d 1323 · 1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2011
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Weaver v. Graham · Miller v. Florida · Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · Halas v. Department of Energy · Bailey v. Noot
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“legislative Acts give fair warning of their effect ... [and] restrain[s] arbitrary and potentially vindictive legislation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kruger v. Erickson“changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kruger v. Erickson“greater punishment than the law in effect on the date of the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kruger v. Erickson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.