Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 979 F.2d 1454 - Moss v. Feldmeyer

Moss v. Feldmeyer’s Empirical Analysis

979 F.2d 1454 · 1992

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
October 2022
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2022

12 federal appellate · 3 district ·

901992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico · Michael Meyers, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. Steinbronn · Sil-Flo, Inc. v. SFHC, Inc. · Smith v. Ford Motor Co. · Lentsch v. Marshall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not described or listed in the pretrial order rests with the sound discretion of the trial judge and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The hurdle which a party must leap in order to gain consideration of an issue not included in the pretrial order is a rather high one: “The order entered following a final pretrial conference shall be modified only to prevent manifest injustice.” It is proper to exclude from a ease any issue not contained in the pretrial order, whether it be a defense or a theory of recovery advanced by [plaintiff], absent the requisite showing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “whereas Ford had only [ten] minutes to prepare for cross-examination, Moss had over two weeks to prepare for Dr. DeJong's cross-examination and eight days to prepare for Dr. Evans' cross-examination, during which time, in each instance, Moss had their respective reports. Under these circumstances, we hold that Moss' ability to cure was not significantly impaired.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.