United States v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
979 F.2d 320 · 1992
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2014
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 13 (Assimilative Crimes Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 287
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Padilla-Martinez v. United States · Griffin v. United States · Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co. · McClain v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the sentence imposed on Hall was not higher than that which could have been convicted under the CFR.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.