Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

979 F.2d 38

Docket No. 88-4126.

Stringer v. Black

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Nov. 24, 1992.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-11-24

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2009

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on Stringer v. Black · Stringer v. Jackson · Stringer v. Jackson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-11-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James E. Ostgard, Minneapolis, Minn, (court-appointed), Kenneth J. Rose, Durham, N.C. (court-appointed), Dennis Sweet, Jackson, Miss, (court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant.

¶2Marvin L. White, Jr., Felicia C. Adams, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jackson, Miss., for respondents-appellees.

¶3ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

¶4Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

¶5DeMOSS, Circuit Judge:

¶6The holding of this court in Stringer v. Jackson, 909 F.2d 111 (1990) has been re*39versed and the cause has been remanded to this court for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court. — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1130, 117 L.Ed.2d 367.

¶7Accordingly, our opinion in Stringer v. Jackson, 862 F.2d 1108 (1988), is modified by deleting therefrom the entirety of sub-part III., C. Aggravating Circumstances, and the judgment of the District Court is VACATED insofar as it holds that there' was no constitutional error in the jury’s use of the “especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel” aggravating circumstance.

¶8This case is REMANDED to the District Court with instructions to issue the writ of habeas corpus unless the State of Mississippi initiates appropriate proceedings in state court within a reasonable time after the issuance of our mandate. In all other respects, the judgment of this court in 862 F.2d 1108 and the judgment of the District Court are REAFFIRMED.

/979/f2d/38 · .json · Public domain