Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 979 F.2d 51 - United States v. Carr

United States v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis

979 F.2d 51 · 1992

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
March 2008
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Alexander v. United States · McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco · Holywell Corp. v. Bank of New York · Workers' Compensation Insurers Rating Ass'n v. Austin Products Co. · United States v. Mejia-Orosco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'A timely notice of appeal is not jurisdictional; however, in this circuit it is a prerequisite to our exercise of jurisdiction.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.