Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 979 F.2d 714 - United States v. Chen

United States v. Chen’s Empirical Analysis

979 F.2d 714 · 1992

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
2
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably 15 Cal. 4th 1229 - People v. Bradford (1997), United States of America v. Theresa Marie Squillacote (2000)

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

190199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3731

Relies on United States v. Leon · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · Brewster v. Derwinski · United States v. McConney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n cases where there is a flagrant disregard for the terms of the warrant”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “were motivated by considerations of practicality rather than by a desire to engage in indiscriminate 'fishing'.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.