Rose v. Franchetti’s Empirical Analysis
979 F.2d 81 · 1992
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Gatx Leasing Corporation v. National Union Fire Insurance Company (1995), Burda v. M. Ecker Co. (1993)
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 2111
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“intermediate state courts offer the best guidance in this enterprise ... unless we have solid reason to believe that the state's highest court would repudiate them”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[t]he rules do not state the limits of judicial power ... [j]udges retain authority, long predating the Rules of Civil Procedure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Pinning down the location of a tortious act in a multi-state transaction is no picnic.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. MacNeil v. Trambert
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.