Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

979 F.2d 848

Docket No. 92-6535.

Skinner v. Baskerville

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: October 14, 1992 Decided: November 20, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-11-20

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Lake Murray Docks, Incorporated v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Intervenor

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-11-20

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-91-627-R)

Donald James Skinner, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert H. Anderson, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

Dismissed.

Before PHILLIPS and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Donald James Skinner seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Skinner v. Baskerville, No. CA-91-627-R (E.D. Va. Apr. 29, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/979/f2d/848 · .json · Public domain